In my last blog, I broke down lust, defining it and explaining where it comes from. I want to state from the beginning here, that there is no easy way out of lust. One cannot simply cast out the demon of lust and never desire again. Don't be fooled! You will desire again, you will lust again - it is part of being a human being. You cannot cut it out from yourself and you cannot exercise it out. But you can control it.
Jesus gave us two steps in overcoming lust:
1. Awareness - by comparing lust to adultery, Jesus was exposing the sin of desire for what it is. In any AA meeting, one of the first steps is admitting one has a problem. It is key to finding victory.
2. Remove the oportunities for temptaion - through overstatement (cut out your eye, cut off your hand) Jesus was in fact saying, "Get rid of those things (even the good things) that lead you into temptation."
If porn is an issue with you, get rid of the websites by going to covenanteyes.com - follow directions there. You can cut off the T.V. channels that draw you into pornography. Get yourself an accountability partner - someone who can help you by holding you accountable. Get into a church group. Do whatever is necessary for you to get out of your issue.
If you are sexually attracted to children, admit it and stay away from them. Don't deceive yourself that you are doing your church or school a service by helping out in the children's ministry. Even if the pastor asks you to help out in the children's ministry, say, "no!" Remove the opportunities for temptation. If you are already in some sort of ministry with kids, find any excuse to get out. People of all kinds overestimate their will power in the area of desire and sex.
A pastor friend of mine was tempted to have an affair with another pastor (woman) at the same church. They were both attracted to each other, so they both agreed to quit their work at that church in order to avoid further temptation.
If you find a member of the opposite sex attractive, do not let yourself be set up in any way. She may need counselling or discipleship - let her go somewhere else. He may want to open up to you about his terrible marriage - let him share with someone else. Don't fall into the trap that you are the one person who can help him. One woman who worked a lot with teenagers told me that she told her leaders never to pray alone with members of the opposite sex (especially on dates), because the intimacy of prayer can easily lead into premarital sex.
If you find someone of the same sex attractive, follow the same rules. Don't let yourself get set up. Be smart. Be at least one step ahead of the game. Don't get caught offguard. Remember, you (and just about everybody else) underestimate the power of temptation. You also overestimate your ability to overcome temptation. So prepare for the worst and you will be ready when temptation comes.
WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE STEEPED IN SEXUAL SIN ALREADY
1. If it is porn? Find yourself an accountability partner, and/or group to get involved in. Go to covenanteyes.com and work with them. If your church has a group for men or women with porn issues, join them.
2. If you are in an affair? I cnnnot relate to this so I will refer you to someone who has more insight than I:
http://www.authorsden.com/categories/article_top.asp?catid=57&id=28873. I like rules the author gives in breaking up:
• Keep it short. Don’t go into in-depth details about why the affair can’t continue. The simpler and cleaner the break-up is, the better.
• Tell them in person and in public area where a scene is less likely to take place.
• Make it final. Don’t allow your affair partner to think there will be a chance of getting back together.
• Be kind. You want to move past this so you can work on your existing relationship or move on.
I like the second point, because I could see that telling the other person in private about a breakup would probably end up in another sexual encounter.
3. If you have some sexual problem you could never tell anybody else about? Follow the advice from #1 and tell them you have an issue with porn. Always refer to your issue as porn. Would you rather lie or be stuck doing what you don't want to do? Lie - tell them you got issues with porn.
4. If you have already had encounters with children? I find myself without the very best advice here, but will definately give it a try.
- You cannot let it go, believing that it won't happen again; that next time, you will be better. If you gave in once, you will not hold youself back when the opportunity arises again - you will be weaker the next time. The seriousness of this sin cannot be over emphasized. What 1 Corinthians 3:16-17 says about bad teaching defiling someone, can be applied just as much, if not more, to the situation of rape or pedophelia:
Do you not know that you are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? If anyone defiles the temple of God, God will destroy him. For the temple of God is holy, which temple you are.
Jesus also said:
“And if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to be thrown into the sea with a large millstone tied around his neck.
I emphasize this because I believe this is the hardest of all sexual sins to find solutions, because no one wants to expose their problem to the world. To ask for help for porn is one thing - to ask help with molesting childrent is a whole different issue. And yet for eternity's sake, and for the sake of all future victims (don't fool yourself - there will be more victims) you must find help, even if it means ruining your life.
Let's put it this way, whose life would you rather ruin? Yours or several children? Are you a Christian? Do you have a successful ministry? If you turn yourself in for help, you will ruin your witness, but you will do what is right before God and find salvation for yourself.
CONCLUSION
If you are a human being, you will have sexual desire for others in life. It cannot be avoided or taken away. God does not ask anyone to completely remove all desire for others. Rather, God asks us to control those desires. We will always be tempted. Temptation is not a sin. Giving into the temptation is.
A good Christian will learn to control his/her feelings and fantasies.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Saturday, March 24, 2012
Lust and Instinct
JESUS' USE OF EXTREMES
Most Christians today know that Jesus equated lust with adultery (Matthew 5:27-30), saying that if you look on a woman (or a man) with lust, you have commited adultery in your heart. This passage is followed up by a simple and easy solution - if your eye causes you to sin, cut it out.
As he did with the subject of anger, Jesus used extremes to emphasize the importance of this topic. These extremes got people's attention and shook them up. People in Jesus' day (as in ours) became easily calloused to anger, name calling and lust. Jesus was getting their attention and alerting them to the fact that this was serious business.
WHAT IS LUST?
The Greek word for lust (epithymeo) is also translated "desire, covet, or want". Epithymeo is not defined as an evil and powerfully uncontrolled passion that rarely if ever overtakes a good Christian, rather it is a natural and common feeling that every Christian and unbeliever faces regularly. We are created to desire people (more than one) for sexual and emotional intimacy. The purpose of this desire is ultimately the survival of humanity.
Because survival leads us to desire more than one person, I believe that the concept of a "soul mate" is a romantic fantasy many people want to believe. The idea that there is only one person for you belongs in romantic novels and not in real life. Too many people believe that they married the wrong person and that their one true love is out there somewhere or is the person with whom they want to have an affair (and of course, once the affair turns into a second or third marriage - shock of discovery! - he or she wasn't the one true love after all).
This internal feeling that there is just one person out there who can fulfil all your emotional needs is destructive to marriages and relationships. This does not mean that there aren't people who would be better connections than others, some relationships are much better than others.
HOW ARE WE LIKE ANIMALS?
Before I talk about how we differ from the animal, I would like to mention how we are similar if not the same. We are very similar in that we desire / lust after others in our own species. We follow up on that desire by sending out physical and verbal signals called flirting, then with foreplay, and finally the act of sex itself. Ultimately the unstated goal of all this excitement is producing a member for next generation. Courtship and consumation is part of God's creation; it is designed for good...all of it, from the first moment of desire to the final act of sex.
Even though we are attracted to many different members of our species, we are most like the kinds of animals that mate for life. Most humans in every society I know believe that marriage should be for life, even if we don't often live up to that standard.
The Bible celebrates the romantic journey of desire and foreplay in the Song of Songs, thus giving it the blessing of God and bringing romance into the holiness of God.
HOW ARE WE DIFFERENT THAN ANIMALS?
When God created us, He breathed His breath / Spirit into us, thus seperating us from the animal. Some have concluded that what seperates us from the animals is reason, and this may be a big part of what does separate us from the animals. Some have also argued that we have a soul, whereas an animal does not. But a soul is not easily defined.
I am not going to get into this debate, because to be honest, I have yet to put my finger on what seperates us from the rest of creation, except this one thing - God breathed into Adam (Adam is both the name of a man in Genesis and also is the generic name for all of humankind) seperating Adam from the rest of creation, and thus making Adam in His image. I will also add that the knowledge of good and evil also separtes us from ther rest of creation, but the knowledge of good and evil may be just another way of defining logic.
Animals act on impulses that come from instinct. Likewise there is a part of us that acts on instinctual impulses. But because God put within us the breath of God, there is something in us that transcends the impulses derived from instinct. The breath of God / image of God is an added gift for us which gives us the ability to control or even even to deny our motives and desires that come from instinct. The knowledge of good and evil helps us to discern what needs to be controlled.
Our instinct and the impulses that come from it are designed for survival of the individual and the group. Our instinct will lead us to permiscuous sex, competing, fighting and arguing with others, killing, genocide, rape, hatred and so on. Given the right circumstances, our instinct will do all sorts of evil we would not dare to contimplate. But remember this: our instinct is always seeking to protect self and the group to which self belongs. All of these sins I have mentioned are self-serving and self-protecting by nature.
Despite the fact that instinct is survival / self focused, this does not necessarily mean that instinct is always what is best for self. Instinct does not reason or judge. Although instinct learns like an animal, through experience, it does not consider long term consequences or advice outside of its own immediate and self serving existence.
Instinct is like a target with concentric circles. The closer the circles get to one's self, the more important that people or groups of people are, and the more likely it is that we will act in the behalf of others.
When the Apostle Peter confessed that Jesus was the messiah (in Mark 8), Jesus commended him claiming this insight was from God. Seconds later, Peter was rebuked by Jesus for a demonic influence involved with the revelation. Peter's world view of the kingdom was intimately influenced by his instincual passion to see his own group (the Jews) survive and raise itself above the rest of humanity. Peter's instinct also saw his relationship to the messiah as an opportunity not only for his nation's interest, but for his own self interest and self-promotion as well.
Although there is a time and place for our instinctual guidance, it can and does conflict with God's interests from time to time.
Most Christians today know that Jesus equated lust with adultery (Matthew 5:27-30), saying that if you look on a woman (or a man) with lust, you have commited adultery in your heart. This passage is followed up by a simple and easy solution - if your eye causes you to sin, cut it out.
As he did with the subject of anger, Jesus used extremes to emphasize the importance of this topic. These extremes got people's attention and shook them up. People in Jesus' day (as in ours) became easily calloused to anger, name calling and lust. Jesus was getting their attention and alerting them to the fact that this was serious business.
WHAT IS LUST?
The Greek word for lust (epithymeo) is also translated "desire, covet, or want". Epithymeo is not defined as an evil and powerfully uncontrolled passion that rarely if ever overtakes a good Christian, rather it is a natural and common feeling that every Christian and unbeliever faces regularly. We are created to desire people (more than one) for sexual and emotional intimacy. The purpose of this desire is ultimately the survival of humanity.
Because survival leads us to desire more than one person, I believe that the concept of a "soul mate" is a romantic fantasy many people want to believe. The idea that there is only one person for you belongs in romantic novels and not in real life. Too many people believe that they married the wrong person and that their one true love is out there somewhere or is the person with whom they want to have an affair (and of course, once the affair turns into a second or third marriage - shock of discovery! - he or she wasn't the one true love after all).
This internal feeling that there is just one person out there who can fulfil all your emotional needs is destructive to marriages and relationships. This does not mean that there aren't people who would be better connections than others, some relationships are much better than others.
HOW ARE WE LIKE ANIMALS?
Before I talk about how we differ from the animal, I would like to mention how we are similar if not the same. We are very similar in that we desire / lust after others in our own species. We follow up on that desire by sending out physical and verbal signals called flirting, then with foreplay, and finally the act of sex itself. Ultimately the unstated goal of all this excitement is producing a member for next generation. Courtship and consumation is part of God's creation; it is designed for good...all of it, from the first moment of desire to the final act of sex.
Even though we are attracted to many different members of our species, we are most like the kinds of animals that mate for life. Most humans in every society I know believe that marriage should be for life, even if we don't often live up to that standard.
The Bible celebrates the romantic journey of desire and foreplay in the Song of Songs, thus giving it the blessing of God and bringing romance into the holiness of God.
HOW ARE WE DIFFERENT THAN ANIMALS?
When God created us, He breathed His breath / Spirit into us, thus seperating us from the animal. Some have concluded that what seperates us from the animals is reason, and this may be a big part of what does separate us from the animals. Some have also argued that we have a soul, whereas an animal does not. But a soul is not easily defined.
I am not going to get into this debate, because to be honest, I have yet to put my finger on what seperates us from the rest of creation, except this one thing - God breathed into Adam (Adam is both the name of a man in Genesis and also is the generic name for all of humankind) seperating Adam from the rest of creation, and thus making Adam in His image. I will also add that the knowledge of good and evil also separtes us from ther rest of creation, but the knowledge of good and evil may be just another way of defining logic.
Animals act on impulses that come from instinct. Likewise there is a part of us that acts on instinctual impulses. But because God put within us the breath of God, there is something in us that transcends the impulses derived from instinct. The breath of God / image of God is an added gift for us which gives us the ability to control or even even to deny our motives and desires that come from instinct. The knowledge of good and evil helps us to discern what needs to be controlled.
Our instinct and the impulses that come from it are designed for survival of the individual and the group. Our instinct will lead us to permiscuous sex, competing, fighting and arguing with others, killing, genocide, rape, hatred and so on. Given the right circumstances, our instinct will do all sorts of evil we would not dare to contimplate. But remember this: our instinct is always seeking to protect self and the group to which self belongs. All of these sins I have mentioned are self-serving and self-protecting by nature.
Despite the fact that instinct is survival / self focused, this does not necessarily mean that instinct is always what is best for self. Instinct does not reason or judge. Although instinct learns like an animal, through experience, it does not consider long term consequences or advice outside of its own immediate and self serving existence.
Instinct is like a target with concentric circles. The closer the circles get to one's self, the more important that people or groups of people are, and the more likely it is that we will act in the behalf of others.
When the Apostle Peter confessed that Jesus was the messiah (in Mark 8), Jesus commended him claiming this insight was from God. Seconds later, Peter was rebuked by Jesus for a demonic influence involved with the revelation. Peter's world view of the kingdom was intimately influenced by his instincual passion to see his own group (the Jews) survive and raise itself above the rest of humanity. Peter's instinct also saw his relationship to the messiah as an opportunity not only for his nation's interest, but for his own self interest and self-promotion as well.
Although there is a time and place for our instinctual guidance, it can and does conflict with God's interests from time to time.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Building Relationship Anger Destroyed
Immediately after Jesus warned us that there were serious consequences to misplaced anger in Matthew 5:21-26, he emphasized what we should do about it when we do fail. In the extreme example Jesus used, anger resulted in a lawsuit against the person getting angry. Jesus warned the offender that God will not step in to help the offender, so it is up to the offender to go to the person offended and work out a deal. This was so important to Jesus, that he told his audience to forget about offerings and gifts for God until issues are resolved.
Jesus gave us extreme examples and gave extreme warnings of extreme consequences about anger. We may not always go to court because of our anger; but there may be times that we simply sever relationships with family or friends. Even if our anger causes far less damage than that of Jesus' example, we are to take anger and its consequences very seriously.
I think that Jesus used the extreme examples and warnings because he wanted his audience to see the seriousness of what anger can do. Angry people usually feel justified in their anger, despite the consequences. Angry people hold on to their anger because they believe that it is the right thing to do. So to get his message through those who hold on to their anger, he spoke harsh warnings. The warnings were designed to shake up and dislodge the areas in where anger resided.
Once anger was exposed, and once people saw that they needed to deal with what their anger had done, Jesus told them how to best make things right. He told his audience to go to the offended person and get things resolved. This was so important that Jesus told his audience to leave God alone until this was done. Once again, this was extreme to make a point - If you want to please God, get things right with others.
WHEN YOU GO TO THE OFFENDED PERSON
Jesus didn't tell his audience at the Sermon on the Mount what to say or do when they went to work on reconciling. On another occasion he told his audience members what to do if someone offended them, but never what to say when the audience members offended others. At best they were left with the advice to go and work it out.
Because so little is said about how to work it out, I can only assume that Jesus was trusting his audience to use their own wisdom in doing and saying what was needed to work out the issues.
Jesus gave us extreme examples and gave extreme warnings of extreme consequences about anger. We may not always go to court because of our anger; but there may be times that we simply sever relationships with family or friends. Even if our anger causes far less damage than that of Jesus' example, we are to take anger and its consequences very seriously.
I think that Jesus used the extreme examples and warnings because he wanted his audience to see the seriousness of what anger can do. Angry people usually feel justified in their anger, despite the consequences. Angry people hold on to their anger because they believe that it is the right thing to do. So to get his message through those who hold on to their anger, he spoke harsh warnings. The warnings were designed to shake up and dislodge the areas in where anger resided.
Once anger was exposed, and once people saw that they needed to deal with what their anger had done, Jesus told them how to best make things right. He told his audience to go to the offended person and get things resolved. This was so important that Jesus told his audience to leave God alone until this was done. Once again, this was extreme to make a point - If you want to please God, get things right with others.
WHEN YOU GO TO THE OFFENDED PERSON
Jesus didn't tell his audience at the Sermon on the Mount what to say or do when they went to work on reconciling. On another occasion he told his audience members what to do if someone offended them, but never what to say when the audience members offended others. At best they were left with the advice to go and work it out.
Because so little is said about how to work it out, I can only assume that Jesus was trusting his audience to use their own wisdom in doing and saying what was needed to work out the issues.
Friday, March 9, 2012
Anger
ANGER
When Jesus preached the Sermon on the Mount, he gave warnings and solutions for one of life's most basic experiences - anger.
THE WARNINGS
Matthew 5:21-26
Jesus emphasized that anger (without proper cause) was a very serious thing. First of all, he related anger to murder, thus emphasizing that uncontrolled anger was not a petty thing. Secondly, Jesus warned that the consequences of anger included judgment, council, prison and Gehenna.
Gehennah was a dump outside of Jerusalem where dead animals and garbage were burned. In Israel, it was used as a metaphore for hell. Because Gehenna is a physical place that is used figuratively, there is debate over how to read this passage. Is Jesus talking about hell or is he talking about the place where dead bodies are burned.
Westerners of the 21st Century are not nearly as concerned about our dead bodies as the 1st Century Jews, so when Jesus mentioned the threat of Gehenna, it is very likely he was warning his listeners that Gehenna was the place their bodies would end up if they didn't heed his warnings. We cannot know all the horror or feelings people felt about the area called Gehenna because we are so removed from the day, but it is possible to compare it to Auschwitz.
Auschwitz is a real place in Poland that has real history; but in the mind of millions it is associated with real memories of horror and cruelty. Although I don't have any historical records, I believe the Romans dumped Jewish bodies in Gehenna, thus making it a First Century Auschwitz.
Either way, whether Jesus was referring to a literal place or to hell, he was telling his audience that the consequences of undeserved anger are extreme, something many of us consider trivial.
To make things even worse, Jesus dished out the worst of these judgments to those who in anger call other people names like "raca", which means "idiot". I think Jesus may have been overemphasizing the consequences of anger, because, people do not generally go to court because they call other people names. However, Jesus was making a statement that we need to take this issue very seriously. Anger and name calling can ruin relationships and destroy communities.
TYPES OF ANGER
When Jesus warned about the evils of anger, he was talking about "anger without a cause". Here are some examples of anger I have seen that I would call "anger without a cause":
1. Childhood Anger - This is sually from childhood injustices that were not properly dealt with. These people get angry very easily and are angry a lot.
2. Transferred Anger - Someone who is angry at someone or something but takes it out on another or others.
3. Brooding Anger - The type of anger that hides behind self-righteousness or denial. It hides until some unexpected time and then comes out inappropriately and unexpectedly. People with this type ustually don't think they have issues with anger. In fact, they may believe that they are very self controlled.
The rule of thumb is this: Anytime anger is inappropriate, overblown, out of context, uncontrolled, or misdirected, it is wrong; it is what I would call "anger without a cause".
EXCUSES FOR ANGER
Angry people make excuses. Here are some of the better of them:
1. "I'm not angry, I'm just frustrated."
2. "I have righteous indignation."
3. "So and so deserves my anger."
4. "I never get angry."
Everybody gets angry. If you think you don't you are hiding it from yourself. It is there, deep enough to avoid detection. It also influences your behavior and the decisions you make. If you want to get over anger issues, you have to be willing to admit you have a problem.
WHEN IS ANGER OK?
Ephesians 4:26-27
In your anger do not sin: Do not let the sun go down while you are still angry, and do not give the devil a foothold.
Anger is a natural response to injustice, and is permitted and even rewarded by God in rare cases. But injustice (that we care about) is usually done to one's self or to one's own group, or in some cases to people we can relate to. Although we are designed self-centered for the sake of survival, self-centered reactions can easily get out of whack, and need to be brought under control. Ephesians gives us perameters for anger:
1. Get over it - Even though the Bible says not to let the sun go down on your anger, it is in fact telling us to work through and get over our angers. Some can be handled in a day, but some will take much longer. As a rule of thumb, the bigger the injustice / betrayal, the longer it will take to get over the anger. No matter how big anger is, it must be dealt with and worked through - not stuffed down inside, ignored, or fed.
2. Don't sin - When we are angry it is very easy to hurt others either by action or by inaction, either by vengence or by holding a grudge. Either way, relationships are hurt, if not destroyed.
3. Don't let the devil take advantage of your anger. This is very closely related to sinning, but I would say that it is when sin is taken to a whole new level. I have experienced times when I was angry and I felt it moving on to a new level. I felt it move in deeper and stronger. Because of Ephesians 4:26 & 27, I knew I had to let my anger go. I knew that it was going to far, so I focused enough to make sure that I didn't sin by giving in to the deep seated anger that was rising. When I felt this, I didn't want to let it go. I wanted to nurture it, but knowing what the Bible says about anger, I refused to feed it, and it went away on its own.
REBUILDING RELATIONSHIPS
Jesus strongly warned against being angry without a cause (Ephesians said be angry with certain limits), and calling people names such as, "worthless," and "idiot", because these attacks make us in danger of eternal damnation. Jesus used extreme consequences to illustrate the importance of this issue.
Relationship was incredibly important to Jesus, so much so, in fact, that he told his followers that before they bring themselves before God, they should get right with people they have offended. That means that whatever we do for God, fasting, praying, going to church, reading the Bible, etc, God wants us to do these acts of faith only after having made peace with others first. Good relationships are that important to God.
When Jesus preached the Sermon on the Mount, he gave warnings and solutions for one of life's most basic experiences - anger.
THE WARNINGS
Matthew 5:21-26
Jesus emphasized that anger (without proper cause) was a very serious thing. First of all, he related anger to murder, thus emphasizing that uncontrolled anger was not a petty thing. Secondly, Jesus warned that the consequences of anger included judgment, council, prison and Gehenna.
Gehennah was a dump outside of Jerusalem where dead animals and garbage were burned. In Israel, it was used as a metaphore for hell. Because Gehenna is a physical place that is used figuratively, there is debate over how to read this passage. Is Jesus talking about hell or is he talking about the place where dead bodies are burned.
Westerners of the 21st Century are not nearly as concerned about our dead bodies as the 1st Century Jews, so when Jesus mentioned the threat of Gehenna, it is very likely he was warning his listeners that Gehenna was the place their bodies would end up if they didn't heed his warnings. We cannot know all the horror or feelings people felt about the area called Gehenna because we are so removed from the day, but it is possible to compare it to Auschwitz.
Auschwitz is a real place in Poland that has real history; but in the mind of millions it is associated with real memories of horror and cruelty. Although I don't have any historical records, I believe the Romans dumped Jewish bodies in Gehenna, thus making it a First Century Auschwitz.
Either way, whether Jesus was referring to a literal place or to hell, he was telling his audience that the consequences of undeserved anger are extreme, something many of us consider trivial.
To make things even worse, Jesus dished out the worst of these judgments to those who in anger call other people names like "raca", which means "idiot". I think Jesus may have been overemphasizing the consequences of anger, because, people do not generally go to court because they call other people names. However, Jesus was making a statement that we need to take this issue very seriously. Anger and name calling can ruin relationships and destroy communities.
TYPES OF ANGER
When Jesus warned about the evils of anger, he was talking about "anger without a cause". Here are some examples of anger I have seen that I would call "anger without a cause":
1. Childhood Anger - This is sually from childhood injustices that were not properly dealt with. These people get angry very easily and are angry a lot.
2. Transferred Anger - Someone who is angry at someone or something but takes it out on another or others.
3. Brooding Anger - The type of anger that hides behind self-righteousness or denial. It hides until some unexpected time and then comes out inappropriately and unexpectedly. People with this type ustually don't think they have issues with anger. In fact, they may believe that they are very self controlled.
The rule of thumb is this: Anytime anger is inappropriate, overblown, out of context, uncontrolled, or misdirected, it is wrong; it is what I would call "anger without a cause".
EXCUSES FOR ANGER
Angry people make excuses. Here are some of the better of them:
1. "I'm not angry, I'm just frustrated."
2. "I have righteous indignation."
3. "So and so deserves my anger."
4. "I never get angry."
Everybody gets angry. If you think you don't you are hiding it from yourself. It is there, deep enough to avoid detection. It also influences your behavior and the decisions you make. If you want to get over anger issues, you have to be willing to admit you have a problem.
WHEN IS ANGER OK?
Ephesians 4:26-27
In your anger do not sin: Do not let the sun go down while you are still angry, and do not give the devil a foothold.
Anger is a natural response to injustice, and is permitted and even rewarded by God in rare cases. But injustice (that we care about) is usually done to one's self or to one's own group, or in some cases to people we can relate to. Although we are designed self-centered for the sake of survival, self-centered reactions can easily get out of whack, and need to be brought under control. Ephesians gives us perameters for anger:
1. Get over it - Even though the Bible says not to let the sun go down on your anger, it is in fact telling us to work through and get over our angers. Some can be handled in a day, but some will take much longer. As a rule of thumb, the bigger the injustice / betrayal, the longer it will take to get over the anger. No matter how big anger is, it must be dealt with and worked through - not stuffed down inside, ignored, or fed.
2. Don't sin - When we are angry it is very easy to hurt others either by action or by inaction, either by vengence or by holding a grudge. Either way, relationships are hurt, if not destroyed.
3. Don't let the devil take advantage of your anger. This is very closely related to sinning, but I would say that it is when sin is taken to a whole new level. I have experienced times when I was angry and I felt it moving on to a new level. I felt it move in deeper and stronger. Because of Ephesians 4:26 & 27, I knew I had to let my anger go. I knew that it was going to far, so I focused enough to make sure that I didn't sin by giving in to the deep seated anger that was rising. When I felt this, I didn't want to let it go. I wanted to nurture it, but knowing what the Bible says about anger, I refused to feed it, and it went away on its own.
REBUILDING RELATIONSHIPS
Jesus strongly warned against being angry without a cause (Ephesians said be angry with certain limits), and calling people names such as, "worthless," and "idiot", because these attacks make us in danger of eternal damnation. Jesus used extreme consequences to illustrate the importance of this issue.
Relationship was incredibly important to Jesus, so much so, in fact, that he told his followers that before they bring themselves before God, they should get right with people they have offended. That means that whatever we do for God, fasting, praying, going to church, reading the Bible, etc, God wants us to do these acts of faith only after having made peace with others first. Good relationships are that important to God.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Self-Control
Jesus' taught a lot about living in community. He focused on breaking down barriers that destroy community such as unforgiveness as well as judging and criticizing others. In this blog I will direct your attention to self-control.
The Sermon on the Mount (in Matthew 5) has 3 areas of passion (anger, lust and revenge) that break down community, whether that community is between two people or a whole lot of people.
Jesus framed each one of these three issues within the context of the Law of the Old Testament. He said that the Law tells us not to kill, but Jesus warned that uncontrolled anger is evil as well; the Law tells us not to commit adultery, but uncontrolled desire for a woman (or a man) is evil too; the Law tells us to keep revenge fair (an eye for an eye), but Jesus told us not to get revenge at all. Jesus' interpretation of the Law focused on personal and community relationships more than the things the religious leaders held dear, such as holiness, the Sabbath, and tithing.
In some ways Jesus was more conservative and held us to a tougher commitment to the Law than his contemporaries, but in other ways he was more liberal. When it came to self-control over anger, lust and revenge, he was tougher; but as far as holiness (in the realm of clean and unclean) and the Sabbath, he was not as rigid or dogmatic. Indeed, Jesus did say that we should tithe (Matthew 23:23), but he emphasized that mercy, judgment and faithfulness were more important.
Note that the religious leaders of Jesus' day focused on commands that were centered on giving to God, whereas Jesus focused on those commandments that were centered on other people. For Jesus, serving others was the way to serve God and neglecting others to serve God was sin. I may have simplified this a bit, but do your own homework and compare what Jesus said was important vs. his opponents.
The next 3 blogs will deal with 3 social poisons against which Jesus warned his followers. The three are anger, lust and revenge. All 3 of these have one common theme - they are all a lack of self control.
The Sermon on the Mount (in Matthew 5) has 3 areas of passion (anger, lust and revenge) that break down community, whether that community is between two people or a whole lot of people.
Jesus framed each one of these three issues within the context of the Law of the Old Testament. He said that the Law tells us not to kill, but Jesus warned that uncontrolled anger is evil as well; the Law tells us not to commit adultery, but uncontrolled desire for a woman (or a man) is evil too; the Law tells us to keep revenge fair (an eye for an eye), but Jesus told us not to get revenge at all. Jesus' interpretation of the Law focused on personal and community relationships more than the things the religious leaders held dear, such as holiness, the Sabbath, and tithing.
In some ways Jesus was more conservative and held us to a tougher commitment to the Law than his contemporaries, but in other ways he was more liberal. When it came to self-control over anger, lust and revenge, he was tougher; but as far as holiness (in the realm of clean and unclean) and the Sabbath, he was not as rigid or dogmatic. Indeed, Jesus did say that we should tithe (Matthew 23:23), but he emphasized that mercy, judgment and faithfulness were more important.
Note that the religious leaders of Jesus' day focused on commands that were centered on giving to God, whereas Jesus focused on those commandments that were centered on other people. For Jesus, serving others was the way to serve God and neglecting others to serve God was sin. I may have simplified this a bit, but do your own homework and compare what Jesus said was important vs. his opponents.
The next 3 blogs will deal with 3 social poisons against which Jesus warned his followers. The three are anger, lust and revenge. All 3 of these have one common theme - they are all a lack of self control.
Saturday, February 18, 2012
Should a Christian Get Involved in Politics?
This blog is more or less my story of how I came to believe about what the New Testament says about modern politics. Over the past 25+ years, I have been pouring over the Bible trying to understand what it says about politics. But like everybody else, I have been affected by my present day surroundings.
THE 1950s
The 1950s was a decade of extreme Conservatism in the U.S. with Senator Joseph McCarthy leading the way. Liberals were hunted down and labeled "Communist" or "Communist sympathizers." Hollywood actors and directors were blacklisted and ten to twelve thousand people lost their jobs. The country was filled with the fear of communism and unquestioned loyalty to authority. Eventually McCarthy went too far in his witchhunts and the courts loosened up the anti-Communist laws.
THE 1960s
By the 1960s there was a change in the air. Liberals became more popular, African Americans rioted and protested against unfair treatment and unjust laws, and young people got tired of an anti-Communist war that was going nowhere except killing thousands of young Americans. Media exposed our own evils as pictures came back from Viet Nam showing that we were not the good guys after all. As a result a lot of young people lost their trust in the leadership of this country and began their own movements to rebel against the establishment.
At the same time as all of this, LSD entered the scene, and marijuana and other drugs became popular among the youth of America. Young people began building their own culture around drugs, music, fashion, and anti-authority.
My teen age years were spent during the 60s, rebelling against authority, including parents, government or church. In my world there was a huge seperation between teens and most of those who were over 30. The values that I held dear were love, sex, peace, drugs, and Rock and Roll.
THE 1970s - BORN AGAIN
In 1971 I became an Evangelical Born Again Christian. With my conversion, my fascination with the 60s lifestyle died. I followed the conservative Christian/Pentecostal values of the Deep South and quit Rock and Roll (for a few years), completely threw out the drugs, and renounced most of the values I picked up from the 60s.
Along with most Evangelicals, I liked and voted for Jimmy Carter who was a Democrat. But he was the last Democrat the Evangelicals supported in mass. Among other faux pas, Jimmy made the mistake of hiring a homosexual on his team, which upset many Evangelicals.
Other than voting for Carter, I had very little interest in politics during the 70s. I was much more interested in the Bible and spiritual matters (althought I did read some about how the political system works). Even though I didn't know it at the time, Evangelical leaders were beginning to look to the political arena in order to help direct the country in ways that was considered moral and spiritual.
THE 1980s - THE RADICAL LEFT
In the late 70s, Anita Bryant began her crusade against homosexuality, and by the 80s the Evangelicals jumped on the pro-life band wagon with the help of Francis Schaeffer and C. Everett Koop (the Catholics had already been working hard to fight for the rights of the unborn for 5 years before the Evangelicals).
With Schaeffer's encouragement Jerry Falwell gathered together like minded Conservatives from different religious groups and formed the Moral Majority while Pat Robertson jumped into the political scene, making a good run for the Presidency after much wavering about what he called "backsliding into politics."
While Evangelicals were turning more and more to Conservative politics in the States, I lived overseas in Europe and Africa, still ignorant of what was taking place among Evangelicals and Politics. I was huddled away in remote areas of Africa studying and teaching the Bible and Psychology, content with only a general books about how the political system works.
When I came back from Africa in 1987 I visited a Seminary friend Kevin (teaching at a college in Nashville) who saturated himself in politics and social studies. During our previous years together at school I always admired him for his intellect and ability to argue anybody under the rug; but unfortunately, by the time I visited him in Nashville, his political, social and economic views drove him away from his Christian rooting, because he felt that Christians weren't doing enough to change the injustices inherent within the world systems. During my short visit in Nashville, I decided to pour into the same books and authors that were so important to Kevin. I wanted to learn what he knew mainly for 2 reasons.
1. I wanted to find out why my friend had lost his faith.
2. I hated feeling at such a loss when I argued with Kevin. He knew so much about stuff I knew nothing about. I could argue with Kevin, but my arguments were always shallow compared to his.
So for the next 10 years I dove into new ideas; politically delving into Socialism, Marxism, Anarchy, Conservatism, Libertarianism, and socially digging into the influences of media, culture, Economics, and as much as I could find - in any direction - that would help me understand about people as individuals and as groups, governments and societies.
During those years I was also trying to find which system of Government I believed was the best. In other words, I wanted to know where I belonged. Was I Anarchist? Marxist? Socialist? Libertarian, Conservative? Nothing seemed to fit. One day (literally one day) I thought I was Marxist (not Russian or Chinese style Marxism, but a purer form), then I leaned toward the Anarchist position. I seemed to like the Anarchist point of view the best, but saw that it too had feet of clay.
The more I read, the more I realized that every system had its problems. When it came right down to it, every system seemed to have great ideals, but when it came to real practice, every system had the same issue... and that was, people will corrupt every ideal. On paper a lot of political systems sound great, but when they are given their time, self interest and greed will seep into every attempt to establish a just government or economy.
So while the Marxist says that Marxism would work if it was ever really tried - the fact is, it can never really be tried without people destroying its ideals through self-interest, greed, lust for power, or whatever; and the same is true with pure Capitalism. No system of government or economy will ever live up to its hopes or its promises, because people within each system will corrupt the purity of the system.
The 1990s - THE PRINCIPALITIES AND THE POWERS
During the 90s I realized that the more I understood about what was going wrong with the nation, the more I fell into despair, fear, and anger. I saw the Evangelical Right become the most powerful voting block, capitalizing on hate, fear and anger. By then I was on the polar opposite side of their agenda and their political aspirations, but I saw that my fear, anger and hatred was the same as their's. In a way, I was just like them. I thought about how aggressive and naive they were, and they thought the same about the what they called the Left, the Democrats (who are not even as Left as I had become - in fact, to me, the Democrats were just another side of the supporters of an unjust economic system that takes from the workers and the poor - Republicans and Democrats were just two sides of the same coin).
At the same time I was facing these issues, and at the same time I began realizing that in many ways (emotionally and idealisticly) I was no different than the Christian Right that was on the opposite side of the political spectrum; I came across Hendrik Berkhoff's, "Christ and the Powers," which claimed that the world was controlled / watched over by spiritual principalities and powers (he was tryin to understand what the Bible was saying about the Hitler era he was living through). These principalities and powers are not demons, Satan or good angels as we tend to view the spiritual world, but rather, they are fallen powers that point us, not to Christ, but to themselves.
With Berkhoff's prodding I saw the Bible come alive with the principalities and powers that are at work within our nations, our governmental and state parties, our way of life, and much more. I discovered that these powers were the unseen movers of societies and governments. I could see that they pointed to themselves and brought dedication to themselves as their ultimate goal.
Still digesting Berkhoff, I was also realizing that the books I was reading rarely offered solid solutions for the problems of our political systems. In fact, they seemed to be much better at pointing out what was wrong with a societies than building working models of just and good societies that could withstand the test of time.
So, in the 1990s I began to let go my identity and belief in politics, and turned more to Jesus... and Jesus alone.
2000s - JESUS ONLY
And when you look up to the sky and see the sun, the moon and the stars—all the heavenly array—do not be enticed into bowing down to them and worshiping things the LORD your God has apportioned to all the nations under heaven. But as for you, the LORD took you and brought you out of the iron-smelting furnace, out of Egypt, to be the people of his inheritance, as you now are (Dueteronomy 4:19-20).
Most of us in the 21st Century would be surprised about what this little known passage is saying. God appointed certain powers over the nations, which Israel turned to in worship. Most Christians today believe that those powers were non existent or demonic, but Deuteronomy is saying that God appointed these powers and that they are real. The Bible is also saying that although He appointed these powers over the nations, His people did not have any of these powers over them, because they belonged only to God. Finally, this passage warned His people to stay away from serving these powers, as they lured His people toward temselves.
During the late 90s I learned that I did not belong to any political party or the powers of this age, but I belonged to God. That doesn't mean that I can't join a party or become politically active; it simply means that I represent, first and foremost, Jesus Christ and His kingdom. I am His ambassador, and as such can minister in any (or most) party or economic system as His representative.
When Paul the Apostle wrote to his Philippian church about his ministry, he said that he had sacrificed every part of his identity in order to belong only to Christ (Philippians 3:1-11). Because Paul had sacrificed his entire identity as a Jew, and as a Pharisee, he was able to minister to Gentiles as a Gentile, and he was able to minister to the Jews as a Jew.
To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to win those not having the law. To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some (1 Corinthians 9:20-22).
Had Paul held diligently to his political and religious parties, he would not have been able to accomplish half of what he did.
CONCLUSIONS
I believe that our world is under the spiritual powers of this age, and there are many. Whether they are individual identities as much of Intertestamental literature claims, I don't know. But I believe these powers serve their own interests and not Christ's.
I believe these powers deceive their followers into believing that they and they are the best possibility for true freedom (2 Peter 2:19).
I believe that the cross of Jesus exposed these powers for what they were - against God and for themselves. And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross (Colossians 2:15). When Jesus (a righteous man, the Son of God) was put to a cruel and humiliating death by their own rulers and those of Rome, it exposed them for what they were. People could see national and political self-interest would send a good man to a nasty death. The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the Lord and against his Anointed One (Acts 4:26).
However, the powers of this world were only temporarily exposed as history moved away from Jesus' generation. Now every generation can say, "that was then." And using that cloak, each new power can once again claim to be God's side...the side of truth. As each generation moves on to the next, we can now distance ourselves from the past and be critical of the past powers while supporting the present. Jesus caught on to this and told the religious leaders of his day:
“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You build tombs for the prophets and decorate the graves of the righteous. And you say, ‘If we had lived in the days of our forefathers, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’ So you testify against yourselves that you are the descendants of those who murdered the prophets. Fill up, then, the measure of the sin of your forefathers (Matthew 23:29-32)!
As the religious leaders of Jesus' day distanted themselves from the sins of past genations, we have done the same, believing ourselves to be on the side of Jesus and the prophets, while bowing down to the powers of this age. So, today while we focus on our personal sins and issues, the cross has lost some of its power - the power to expose the principalities and the powers of this present age.
I believe that Christians need to renounce their identities in this temporary world as Paul renounced his in Phillipians 3. Renouncing his identities did not mean that Paul stopped loving his people or valuing his religious training. It meant that Paul no longer accepted his national, political and religious identities to define who he was. His new identity was completely wrapped up in Jesus Christ and in the cross and resurrection of Jesus. As such, he was able to minister to different groups that were opposed to each other in this world. Paul was not an ambassador of the Pharisees, or of the Republicans; he was an ambassador for Christ, and Christ alone.
HOW SHOULD WE DEAL WITH THE POWERS OF THIS AGE
Jude and 2 Peter 2 were First Century letters written in hot political times. These books provide us with solid direction in dealing with the powers of this age.
Stay Away from Trash Talk
Peter and Jude spoke about the spiritual/political powers and warned the Christians to stay away from those who spoke evil of the powers, and who spoke evil of the rulers on earth that were aligned with the powers. It is embarrassing how much the Christian community can fall into this. When the Apostle Paul stood before the Sanhedrin (the High Court of Israel), the High Priest ordered him to be slapped. Paul answered back with a harsh threat, "Then Paul said to him, "God will strike you, you whitewashed wall! You sit there to judge me according to the law, yet you yourself violate the law by commanding that I be struck (Matthew 23:3)!" When Paul was told that he spoke that way to the High Priest, he apologized, "Brothers, I did not realize that he was the high priest; for it is written: 'Do not speak evil about the ruler of your people (Matthew 23:5).'"
The political pundits on the radio that trash our leaders are not speaking from God!
Don't Get Misled by Political Promises, Instead Follow Godliness
Peter and Jude told their readers to stay away from those who promised freedom while trapping them in their own political turmoil. Jude told his readers to follow faith, hope and love instead (Jude 1:20-21).
Peter, in 2 Peter 3, told his readers to be patient, not to be led astray, to hope for the return of Christ, and to keep holy (that is, seperated for God).
FINAL COMMENTS
- As much as I think the New Testament discouraged following after the powers of this world, I don't think it forbade involvement in politics.
- I question how much the Evangelical Right in America has worshipped at the altar of a world power. No doubt, many of its people have, and still bow down to a worldly power, convinced it is one and the same as God's only choice; but I also believe that good Christians can be in most political parties of any nation. Like individuals, there is both good and bad in any system. Old Testament prophets came from all different economic and political backgrounds, so I expect that God would place good Christians in different parties in today's world as well.
- Christians need to separate themselves from their own leanings, surrender to Christ and come back in representing Him first and foremost.
- Christians need to open their eyes to the falicies within their own political parties.
- Christians need to repent from demonizing other parties - it is one of the surest signs that they have bowed down to the powers of this world.
- Christians outside of the United States can easily see the falicies of the U.S. system, but bow down no less to their own systems. They can get every bit as defensive of and supportive of theirs while trashing the U.S. This world's powers are not just among the most powerful.
- Jude and 2 Peter were written during and about rising rebellions (filled with promise) in their own times.
- We do not bow down to the powers of this world.
- We do not allow ourselves to be carried away by their promises.
- The New Testament is very clear about this, we do not fall into talking trash about our leaders and the powers of this world. For better or for worse, the Bible says they are established by God (Romans 13:1). When Paul stated this about Roman authority, he was telling his people to subject themselves to the very person who would later have Paul killed for his faith. Jude and 2 Peter also warn against speaking evil of these powers.
QUESTIONS I HAVE
Q: What was the proper response to Hitler?
A: This Century has seen a few rulers who can be best described as evil. Hitler stands out above the rest. They present to us a huge problem, in that, according to the Bible, rulers are appointed by God for the purpose of justice and well being of humanity, and therefore should have a measure of respect and obedience . I think Paul faced the issue similar to Hitler with Nero, when he wrote Romans 13.
In 1934 the Confessing Church in Germany put out a declaration seperating the Church and Christ from the State. The resulting document is called the Barmen Declaration. In it, the group rejects the State's intrusion into the Church and visa versa; but the Barmen Declaration doesn't give any calls to action, such as open rebellion or non-violent protest.
Q: When is it right to join resistant movements? After all, the resistant movement may be the next group in power that we should pay biblical respect to.
A: I don't know, but two factors help judge when it is right to resist the powers that surface in resistant movements, but these factors do not answer every question for any situation. We need to ask ourselves about:
1. The Future's Judgment - Unfortuneately we will not know what historians will say until years after our present events. Billy Graham, who tore down racial barriers in his auditoriums, asked Martin Luther King to be more patient in the struggle for Civil Rights. But patience was not the answer, so history was on the side of Martin Luther King.
Although we cannot be sure what the future will say about the present, past history can help us make better decisions for present situations.
2. World Opinion - World opinion has helped bring down Apartheid in South Africa, but remains unheard in too many other cases.
THE 1950s
The 1950s was a decade of extreme Conservatism in the U.S. with Senator Joseph McCarthy leading the way. Liberals were hunted down and labeled "Communist" or "Communist sympathizers." Hollywood actors and directors were blacklisted and ten to twelve thousand people lost their jobs. The country was filled with the fear of communism and unquestioned loyalty to authority. Eventually McCarthy went too far in his witchhunts and the courts loosened up the anti-Communist laws.
THE 1960s
By the 1960s there was a change in the air. Liberals became more popular, African Americans rioted and protested against unfair treatment and unjust laws, and young people got tired of an anti-Communist war that was going nowhere except killing thousands of young Americans. Media exposed our own evils as pictures came back from Viet Nam showing that we were not the good guys after all. As a result a lot of young people lost their trust in the leadership of this country and began their own movements to rebel against the establishment.
At the same time as all of this, LSD entered the scene, and marijuana and other drugs became popular among the youth of America. Young people began building their own culture around drugs, music, fashion, and anti-authority.
My teen age years were spent during the 60s, rebelling against authority, including parents, government or church. In my world there was a huge seperation between teens and most of those who were over 30. The values that I held dear were love, sex, peace, drugs, and Rock and Roll.
THE 1970s - BORN AGAIN
In 1971 I became an Evangelical Born Again Christian. With my conversion, my fascination with the 60s lifestyle died. I followed the conservative Christian/Pentecostal values of the Deep South and quit Rock and Roll (for a few years), completely threw out the drugs, and renounced most of the values I picked up from the 60s.
Along with most Evangelicals, I liked and voted for Jimmy Carter who was a Democrat. But he was the last Democrat the Evangelicals supported in mass. Among other faux pas, Jimmy made the mistake of hiring a homosexual on his team, which upset many Evangelicals.
Other than voting for Carter, I had very little interest in politics during the 70s. I was much more interested in the Bible and spiritual matters (althought I did read some about how the political system works). Even though I didn't know it at the time, Evangelical leaders were beginning to look to the political arena in order to help direct the country in ways that was considered moral and spiritual.
THE 1980s - THE RADICAL LEFT
In the late 70s, Anita Bryant began her crusade against homosexuality, and by the 80s the Evangelicals jumped on the pro-life band wagon with the help of Francis Schaeffer and C. Everett Koop (the Catholics had already been working hard to fight for the rights of the unborn for 5 years before the Evangelicals).
With Schaeffer's encouragement Jerry Falwell gathered together like minded Conservatives from different religious groups and formed the Moral Majority while Pat Robertson jumped into the political scene, making a good run for the Presidency after much wavering about what he called "backsliding into politics."
While Evangelicals were turning more and more to Conservative politics in the States, I lived overseas in Europe and Africa, still ignorant of what was taking place among Evangelicals and Politics. I was huddled away in remote areas of Africa studying and teaching the Bible and Psychology, content with only a general books about how the political system works.
When I came back from Africa in 1987 I visited a Seminary friend Kevin (teaching at a college in Nashville) who saturated himself in politics and social studies. During our previous years together at school I always admired him for his intellect and ability to argue anybody under the rug; but unfortunately, by the time I visited him in Nashville, his political, social and economic views drove him away from his Christian rooting, because he felt that Christians weren't doing enough to change the injustices inherent within the world systems. During my short visit in Nashville, I decided to pour into the same books and authors that were so important to Kevin. I wanted to learn what he knew mainly for 2 reasons.
1. I wanted to find out why my friend had lost his faith.
2. I hated feeling at such a loss when I argued with Kevin. He knew so much about stuff I knew nothing about. I could argue with Kevin, but my arguments were always shallow compared to his.
So for the next 10 years I dove into new ideas; politically delving into Socialism, Marxism, Anarchy, Conservatism, Libertarianism, and socially digging into the influences of media, culture, Economics, and as much as I could find - in any direction - that would help me understand about people as individuals and as groups, governments and societies.
During those years I was also trying to find which system of Government I believed was the best. In other words, I wanted to know where I belonged. Was I Anarchist? Marxist? Socialist? Libertarian, Conservative? Nothing seemed to fit. One day (literally one day) I thought I was Marxist (not Russian or Chinese style Marxism, but a purer form), then I leaned toward the Anarchist position. I seemed to like the Anarchist point of view the best, but saw that it too had feet of clay.
The more I read, the more I realized that every system had its problems. When it came right down to it, every system seemed to have great ideals, but when it came to real practice, every system had the same issue... and that was, people will corrupt every ideal. On paper a lot of political systems sound great, but when they are given their time, self interest and greed will seep into every attempt to establish a just government or economy.
So while the Marxist says that Marxism would work if it was ever really tried - the fact is, it can never really be tried without people destroying its ideals through self-interest, greed, lust for power, or whatever; and the same is true with pure Capitalism. No system of government or economy will ever live up to its hopes or its promises, because people within each system will corrupt the purity of the system.
The 1990s - THE PRINCIPALITIES AND THE POWERS
During the 90s I realized that the more I understood about what was going wrong with the nation, the more I fell into despair, fear, and anger. I saw the Evangelical Right become the most powerful voting block, capitalizing on hate, fear and anger. By then I was on the polar opposite side of their agenda and their political aspirations, but I saw that my fear, anger and hatred was the same as their's. In a way, I was just like them. I thought about how aggressive and naive they were, and they thought the same about the what they called the Left, the Democrats (who are not even as Left as I had become - in fact, to me, the Democrats were just another side of the supporters of an unjust economic system that takes from the workers and the poor - Republicans and Democrats were just two sides of the same coin).
At the same time I was facing these issues, and at the same time I began realizing that in many ways (emotionally and idealisticly) I was no different than the Christian Right that was on the opposite side of the political spectrum; I came across Hendrik Berkhoff's, "Christ and the Powers," which claimed that the world was controlled / watched over by spiritual principalities and powers (he was tryin to understand what the Bible was saying about the Hitler era he was living through). These principalities and powers are not demons, Satan or good angels as we tend to view the spiritual world, but rather, they are fallen powers that point us, not to Christ, but to themselves.
With Berkhoff's prodding I saw the Bible come alive with the principalities and powers that are at work within our nations, our governmental and state parties, our way of life, and much more. I discovered that these powers were the unseen movers of societies and governments. I could see that they pointed to themselves and brought dedication to themselves as their ultimate goal.
Still digesting Berkhoff, I was also realizing that the books I was reading rarely offered solid solutions for the problems of our political systems. In fact, they seemed to be much better at pointing out what was wrong with a societies than building working models of just and good societies that could withstand the test of time.
So, in the 1990s I began to let go my identity and belief in politics, and turned more to Jesus... and Jesus alone.
2000s - JESUS ONLY
And when you look up to the sky and see the sun, the moon and the stars—all the heavenly array—do not be enticed into bowing down to them and worshiping things the LORD your God has apportioned to all the nations under heaven. But as for you, the LORD took you and brought you out of the iron-smelting furnace, out of Egypt, to be the people of his inheritance, as you now are (Dueteronomy 4:19-20).
Most of us in the 21st Century would be surprised about what this little known passage is saying. God appointed certain powers over the nations, which Israel turned to in worship. Most Christians today believe that those powers were non existent or demonic, but Deuteronomy is saying that God appointed these powers and that they are real. The Bible is also saying that although He appointed these powers over the nations, His people did not have any of these powers over them, because they belonged only to God. Finally, this passage warned His people to stay away from serving these powers, as they lured His people toward temselves.
During the late 90s I learned that I did not belong to any political party or the powers of this age, but I belonged to God. That doesn't mean that I can't join a party or become politically active; it simply means that I represent, first and foremost, Jesus Christ and His kingdom. I am His ambassador, and as such can minister in any (or most) party or economic system as His representative.
When Paul the Apostle wrote to his Philippian church about his ministry, he said that he had sacrificed every part of his identity in order to belong only to Christ (Philippians 3:1-11). Because Paul had sacrificed his entire identity as a Jew, and as a Pharisee, he was able to minister to Gentiles as a Gentile, and he was able to minister to the Jews as a Jew.
To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to win those not having the law. To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some (1 Corinthians 9:20-22).
Had Paul held diligently to his political and religious parties, he would not have been able to accomplish half of what he did.
CONCLUSIONS
I believe that our world is under the spiritual powers of this age, and there are many. Whether they are individual identities as much of Intertestamental literature claims, I don't know. But I believe these powers serve their own interests and not Christ's.
I believe these powers deceive their followers into believing that they and they are the best possibility for true freedom (2 Peter 2:19).
I believe that the cross of Jesus exposed these powers for what they were - against God and for themselves. And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross (Colossians 2:15). When Jesus (a righteous man, the Son of God) was put to a cruel and humiliating death by their own rulers and those of Rome, it exposed them for what they were. People could see national and political self-interest would send a good man to a nasty death. The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the Lord and against his Anointed One (Acts 4:26).
However, the powers of this world were only temporarily exposed as history moved away from Jesus' generation. Now every generation can say, "that was then." And using that cloak, each new power can once again claim to be God's side...the side of truth. As each generation moves on to the next, we can now distance ourselves from the past and be critical of the past powers while supporting the present. Jesus caught on to this and told the religious leaders of his day:
“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You build tombs for the prophets and decorate the graves of the righteous. And you say, ‘If we had lived in the days of our forefathers, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’ So you testify against yourselves that you are the descendants of those who murdered the prophets. Fill up, then, the measure of the sin of your forefathers (Matthew 23:29-32)!
As the religious leaders of Jesus' day distanted themselves from the sins of past genations, we have done the same, believing ourselves to be on the side of Jesus and the prophets, while bowing down to the powers of this age. So, today while we focus on our personal sins and issues, the cross has lost some of its power - the power to expose the principalities and the powers of this present age.
I believe that Christians need to renounce their identities in this temporary world as Paul renounced his in Phillipians 3. Renouncing his identities did not mean that Paul stopped loving his people or valuing his religious training. It meant that Paul no longer accepted his national, political and religious identities to define who he was. His new identity was completely wrapped up in Jesus Christ and in the cross and resurrection of Jesus. As such, he was able to minister to different groups that were opposed to each other in this world. Paul was not an ambassador of the Pharisees, or of the Republicans; he was an ambassador for Christ, and Christ alone.
HOW SHOULD WE DEAL WITH THE POWERS OF THIS AGE
Jude and 2 Peter 2 were First Century letters written in hot political times. These books provide us with solid direction in dealing with the powers of this age.
Stay Away from Trash Talk
Peter and Jude spoke about the spiritual/political powers and warned the Christians to stay away from those who spoke evil of the powers, and who spoke evil of the rulers on earth that were aligned with the powers. It is embarrassing how much the Christian community can fall into this. When the Apostle Paul stood before the Sanhedrin (the High Court of Israel), the High Priest ordered him to be slapped. Paul answered back with a harsh threat, "Then Paul said to him, "God will strike you, you whitewashed wall! You sit there to judge me according to the law, yet you yourself violate the law by commanding that I be struck (Matthew 23:3)!" When Paul was told that he spoke that way to the High Priest, he apologized, "Brothers, I did not realize that he was the high priest; for it is written: 'Do not speak evil about the ruler of your people (Matthew 23:5).'"
The political pundits on the radio that trash our leaders are not speaking from God!
Don't Get Misled by Political Promises, Instead Follow Godliness
Peter and Jude told their readers to stay away from those who promised freedom while trapping them in their own political turmoil. Jude told his readers to follow faith, hope and love instead (Jude 1:20-21).
Peter, in 2 Peter 3, told his readers to be patient, not to be led astray, to hope for the return of Christ, and to keep holy (that is, seperated for God).
FINAL COMMENTS
- As much as I think the New Testament discouraged following after the powers of this world, I don't think it forbade involvement in politics.
- I question how much the Evangelical Right in America has worshipped at the altar of a world power. No doubt, many of its people have, and still bow down to a worldly power, convinced it is one and the same as God's only choice; but I also believe that good Christians can be in most political parties of any nation. Like individuals, there is both good and bad in any system. Old Testament prophets came from all different economic and political backgrounds, so I expect that God would place good Christians in different parties in today's world as well.
- Christians need to separate themselves from their own leanings, surrender to Christ and come back in representing Him first and foremost.
- Christians need to open their eyes to the falicies within their own political parties.
- Christians need to repent from demonizing other parties - it is one of the surest signs that they have bowed down to the powers of this world.
- Christians outside of the United States can easily see the falicies of the U.S. system, but bow down no less to their own systems. They can get every bit as defensive of and supportive of theirs while trashing the U.S. This world's powers are not just among the most powerful.
- Jude and 2 Peter were written during and about rising rebellions (filled with promise) in their own times.
- We do not bow down to the powers of this world.
- We do not allow ourselves to be carried away by their promises.
- The New Testament is very clear about this, we do not fall into talking trash about our leaders and the powers of this world. For better or for worse, the Bible says they are established by God (Romans 13:1). When Paul stated this about Roman authority, he was telling his people to subject themselves to the very person who would later have Paul killed for his faith. Jude and 2 Peter also warn against speaking evil of these powers.
QUESTIONS I HAVE
Q: What was the proper response to Hitler?
A: This Century has seen a few rulers who can be best described as evil. Hitler stands out above the rest. They present to us a huge problem, in that, according to the Bible, rulers are appointed by God for the purpose of justice and well being of humanity, and therefore should have a measure of respect and obedience . I think Paul faced the issue similar to Hitler with Nero, when he wrote Romans 13.
In 1934 the Confessing Church in Germany put out a declaration seperating the Church and Christ from the State. The resulting document is called the Barmen Declaration. In it, the group rejects the State's intrusion into the Church and visa versa; but the Barmen Declaration doesn't give any calls to action, such as open rebellion or non-violent protest.
Q: When is it right to join resistant movements? After all, the resistant movement may be the next group in power that we should pay biblical respect to.
A: I don't know, but two factors help judge when it is right to resist the powers that surface in resistant movements, but these factors do not answer every question for any situation. We need to ask ourselves about:
1. The Future's Judgment - Unfortuneately we will not know what historians will say until years after our present events. Billy Graham, who tore down racial barriers in his auditoriums, asked Martin Luther King to be more patient in the struggle for Civil Rights. But patience was not the answer, so history was on the side of Martin Luther King.
Although we cannot be sure what the future will say about the present, past history can help us make better decisions for present situations.
2. World Opinion - World opinion has helped bring down Apartheid in South Africa, but remains unheard in too many other cases.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
When Judging Is Wrong
There are two types of judgment in the New Testament: In the first type of judgment, church discipline, Christians were suppose to judge and discipline other Believers who created divisions and / or lived in open sin. The second type of judgment was mentioned by Jesuus in the Sermon on the Mount.
Matthew 7:1-6
Matthew 7:1-6
“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
“Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and then turn and tear you to pieces."
THE CONTEXT
The context of Matthew's "do not judge" is set in the verses that follow it, which tell us that what we see in others can be affected by what we do ourselves. Ted Haggard was an Evangelical preacher over a large church who openly opposed gay rights/marriage. Even though he preached so against gays, he was practicing gay sex and taking meth with paid male prostitutes. Jimmi Swaggart, likewise preached and wrote books about the evils of fornication and pornography, while he himself secretly visited prostitutes and was steeped in porn.
When I was a pastor, a woman who was in my church believed that her husband and her sister were having affairs with other people. After some counseling, the truth came out that she had an affair with the man she thought her husband was having sex with.
All of these did exactly what Matthew 5 told us not to do - they judged others through the eyes of their own issue. The plank in their eyes was so big, that all they could see or understand was their own sin, and so they saw their own sin in others, whether it was real or not (usually not).
Sin is a big plank that distorts one's vision of others, but it is not the only plank that distorts vision. Many people have planks that have been thrust upon them by unjust and bad situations. A victim of rape may spend his/her entire life seeing and suspecting sexual predators that may or may not be real. Whether or not what they see in others is real, they see life in a way that has been affected by their own rape. Likewise, someone who has been badly betrayed may see betrayal in all too many situations.
SOLUTION
Jesus' solution for judging others is simple:
1. Get the plank out of your own eye first.
2. Then help others get the specks out of their eyes.
To be honest, I think once one realizes he/she has a plank in his/her eyes; the specks in most other peoples' eyes are not so important after all.
In community it is imperative that you see that your judging is a sin and that you need to make two steps:
1. First you need to confess that your judgments are not a sign of superiority, holiness, or great spiritual standards. In the context we are discussing, these are just code words for arrogance and pride. In reality, your judgments are from the flesh, and wrong.
I cannot stress the importance of realizing that you do have a problem with criticism. Rarely do we see the severity of judging others. It is kind of like an addiction in which we are convinced we do not have a problem, so once we have faced the truth that we have a problem, we are on the way to recovery.
2. Once you are able to admit that there is a beam in your own eye, the rest comes very easily. You need to get the beam out of their own eye. You can do this by confessing before God that you have a beam in your own eye and then praying that God will help you by removing it. At this point, the criticism naturally fades.
HELPING OTHERS
When I face the reality that I am judgmental and confess that to God, the power of that judmentalism is disarmed. At this point I am able to be easier on others, letting go of their offenses more easily, knowing that I am guilty of the same if not worse.
Once I have dealt with my own sins, then if there is someone who is steeped in the same or similar problem, I am much more able to help that person with their problems. And from that other person's point of view, it is easier to receive help from someone who is humble and has gone through similar issues, than it is to receive help from someone who is arrogant and critical.
WHEN SHOULD WE NOT TRY TO HELP OTHERS
Finally, at the end of Jesus' lesson, he told us to let go of those people who despise correction. Many people don't ever want to hear that there is any thing wrong with them, so if you try to help them out, they will turn around and attack you. Jesus said, "Leave them alone, or else they will turn around and attack you."
The context of Matthew's "do not judge" is set in the verses that follow it, which tell us that what we see in others can be affected by what we do ourselves. Ted Haggard was an Evangelical preacher over a large church who openly opposed gay rights/marriage. Even though he preached so against gays, he was practicing gay sex and taking meth with paid male prostitutes. Jimmi Swaggart, likewise preached and wrote books about the evils of fornication and pornography, while he himself secretly visited prostitutes and was steeped in porn.
When I was a pastor, a woman who was in my church believed that her husband and her sister were having affairs with other people. After some counseling, the truth came out that she had an affair with the man she thought her husband was having sex with.
All of these did exactly what Matthew 5 told us not to do - they judged others through the eyes of their own issue. The plank in their eyes was so big, that all they could see or understand was their own sin, and so they saw their own sin in others, whether it was real or not (usually not).
Sin is a big plank that distorts one's vision of others, but it is not the only plank that distorts vision. Many people have planks that have been thrust upon them by unjust and bad situations. A victim of rape may spend his/her entire life seeing and suspecting sexual predators that may or may not be real. Whether or not what they see in others is real, they see life in a way that has been affected by their own rape. Likewise, someone who has been badly betrayed may see betrayal in all too many situations.
SOLUTION
Jesus' solution for judging others is simple:
1. Get the plank out of your own eye first.
2. Then help others get the specks out of their eyes.
To be honest, I think once one realizes he/she has a plank in his/her eyes; the specks in most other peoples' eyes are not so important after all.
In community it is imperative that you see that your judging is a sin and that you need to make two steps:
1. First you need to confess that your judgments are not a sign of superiority, holiness, or great spiritual standards. In the context we are discussing, these are just code words for arrogance and pride. In reality, your judgments are from the flesh, and wrong.
I cannot stress the importance of realizing that you do have a problem with criticism. Rarely do we see the severity of judging others. It is kind of like an addiction in which we are convinced we do not have a problem, so once we have faced the truth that we have a problem, we are on the way to recovery.
2. Once you are able to admit that there is a beam in your own eye, the rest comes very easily. You need to get the beam out of their own eye. You can do this by confessing before God that you have a beam in your own eye and then praying that God will help you by removing it. At this point, the criticism naturally fades.
HELPING OTHERS
When I face the reality that I am judgmental and confess that to God, the power of that judmentalism is disarmed. At this point I am able to be easier on others, letting go of their offenses more easily, knowing that I am guilty of the same if not worse.
Once I have dealt with my own sins, then if there is someone who is steeped in the same or similar problem, I am much more able to help that person with their problems. And from that other person's point of view, it is easier to receive help from someone who is humble and has gone through similar issues, than it is to receive help from someone who is arrogant and critical.
WHEN SHOULD WE NOT TRY TO HELP OTHERS
Finally, at the end of Jesus' lesson, he told us to let go of those people who despise correction. Many people don't ever want to hear that there is any thing wrong with them, so if you try to help them out, they will turn around and attack you. Jesus said, "Leave them alone, or else they will turn around and attack you."
Friday, January 27, 2012
Judging and Church Discipline
WHEN IS JUDGING NECESSARY
If you've ever been in a situation where your church disciplines someone, you probably witnessed a church divided. No matter what a person, deacon or pastor does to get into trouble, there will be people who flatly disagree with discipline and say things like, "Christians should not shoot their own," "Aren't we suppose to forgive?" and so on. But the New Testament clearly teaches that we should not only judge those who are in the community; it tells us that there are times that we should discipline as well.
CHURCH DISCIPLINE IN THE FIRST CENTURY
Jesus gave us the bare basics for church discipline when he said, “If your brother sins against you, go and show him his fault, just between the two of you. If he listens to you, you have won your brother over. But if he will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’ If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax collector (Matthew 18:15-17).
The Apostles John and Paul likewise taught the importance of church discipline when they dealt with different issues:
If you've ever been in a situation where your church disciplines someone, you probably witnessed a church divided. No matter what a person, deacon or pastor does to get into trouble, there will be people who flatly disagree with discipline and say things like, "Christians should not shoot their own," "Aren't we suppose to forgive?" and so on. But the New Testament clearly teaches that we should not only judge those who are in the community; it tells us that there are times that we should discipline as well.
CHURCH DISCIPLINE IN THE FIRST CENTURY
Jesus gave us the bare basics for church discipline when he said, “If your brother sins against you, go and show him his fault, just between the two of you. If he listens to you, you have won your brother over. But if he will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’ If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax collector (Matthew 18:15-17).
The Apostles John and Paul likewise taught the importance of church discipline when they dealt with different issues:
But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat (1 Corinthians 5:11).
If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not take him into your house or welcome him (2 John 1:10).
I believe the entire early church practiced discipline in the community, and the form of discipline was first warnings, and then if the warnings were not heeded, shunning.
SHUNNING AND SATAN
In the First Century, people did not have a multitude of denominations and churches to visit, attend and settle into. If they were lucky, people had one church in the city they could attend. So when Paul told the Corinthians to shun a man who was living with his father's wife, he had no other churches he could go to.
To a degree, this would be the same as being handed one over to Satan (1 Corinthians 5:5), because the person disciplined was thrown out of the church, and thereby out of the protection of God and His people. I said "to a degree," because when Paul told the Corinthians to shun that certain somebody, he said it was for the destruction of the flesh so that the certain somebody could be saved in the day of Judgment.
It all seems foreign to us, but I think Paul believed that by giving somebody over to Satan we could actually call down a flesh destructive demon of some sort. However that may be, in his second letter he told the church to accept the man back into the fold because he had properly responded to his shunning. In Paul's second letter, there is no mention of the man's flesh being destroyed or hurt during the time he was pushed out of the church.
WHEN SHOULD WE JUDGE AND DISCIPLINE?
1. John believed that we should absolutely ignore and turn away travelling preachers who teach bad doctrrine when it comes to Jesus (2 John 1:10-11). In 1 John, the author tells us to test the spirits (preachers and teachers) to see if they are from God. In order to test the spirits, judging is necessary (1 John 4:1).
2. Paul told his churches to avoid people who started divisions (Romans 16:17-18). Paul likewise told his readers to test everything, and to hold on to that which is good (1 Thessalonians 5:21). Once again, judging other Christians is imperative in this.
3. Paul also told his churches to reject heretics (people who follow or promote bad doctrine [Titus 3:10]).
4. Paul also told the Corinthians to shun a man who was sleeping with his step mom (1 Corinthians 5).
5. Finally, here is a list of Christians (not unbelievers) that we should stay away from according to Paul in 1 Corinthians 5:11:
a. A sexually immoral person
b. A greedy person
c. An idolater
d. A slanderer
e. A drunkard
f. A swindler
THE GOAL OF DISCIPLINE
The goal of discipline was not to make enemies or turn people away from the faith. Rather, the goal was to help people to avoid sexual immorality, drunkeness, greed and so on. It was to help people to become better members of the community.
CAN DISCIPLINE GO TOO FAR?
Jesus gave a parable about a farmer who had an enemy (Matthew 13). The farmer planted good seed and his enemy came by night and planted tares to ruin his field. As the plants grew, the farmer could tell that his field had been messed with.
The servents who took care of the field wanted to pull out the weeds, but the farmer was afraid that if he had all the tares pulled out, good crop would likewise be destroyed. He concluded that it was best to allow them both to grow together until the harvest. During harvest, the separation could begin.
This parable was designed by Jesus to tell us that in community discipline, purging and purifying the group can go too far. As we get rid of the bad, good people will likewise be yanked out of the community. This happens in two ways. First of all, when church boards / community leaders get on the roll of throwing out the bad, they begin to fall into the mistake of seeing bad in the good. In other words, they go too far and before too long they are tossing out good people. The Salem Witchhunt was an extreme example of this. The second way that church discipline hurts a church is when the community leaders discipline (someone who does deserve it) there will probably be good people who are affected and will leave on their own.
Discipline in a church carries good and bad consequences. This not to say that we should not have discipline because there will be bad consequences; it is to say that we need to knowthe consequences, consider the consequences, and act wisely when we do discipline.
To a degree, this would be the same as being handed one over to Satan (1 Corinthians 5:5), because the person disciplined was thrown out of the church, and thereby out of the protection of God and His people. I said "to a degree," because when Paul told the Corinthians to shun that certain somebody, he said it was for the destruction of the flesh so that the certain somebody could be saved in the day of Judgment.
It all seems foreign to us, but I think Paul believed that by giving somebody over to Satan we could actually call down a flesh destructive demon of some sort. However that may be, in his second letter he told the church to accept the man back into the fold because he had properly responded to his shunning. In Paul's second letter, there is no mention of the man's flesh being destroyed or hurt during the time he was pushed out of the church.
WHEN SHOULD WE JUDGE AND DISCIPLINE?
1. John believed that we should absolutely ignore and turn away travelling preachers who teach bad doctrrine when it comes to Jesus (2 John 1:10-11). In 1 John, the author tells us to test the spirits (preachers and teachers) to see if they are from God. In order to test the spirits, judging is necessary (1 John 4:1).
2. Paul told his churches to avoid people who started divisions (Romans 16:17-18). Paul likewise told his readers to test everything, and to hold on to that which is good (1 Thessalonians 5:21). Once again, judging other Christians is imperative in this.
3. Paul also told his churches to reject heretics (people who follow or promote bad doctrine [Titus 3:10]).
4. Paul also told the Corinthians to shun a man who was sleeping with his step mom (1 Corinthians 5).
5. Finally, here is a list of Christians (not unbelievers) that we should stay away from according to Paul in 1 Corinthians 5:11:
a. A sexually immoral person
b. A greedy person
c. An idolater
d. A slanderer
e. A drunkard
f. A swindler
THE GOAL OF DISCIPLINE
The goal of discipline was not to make enemies or turn people away from the faith. Rather, the goal was to help people to avoid sexual immorality, drunkeness, greed and so on. It was to help people to become better members of the community.
CAN DISCIPLINE GO TOO FAR?
Jesus gave a parable about a farmer who had an enemy (Matthew 13). The farmer planted good seed and his enemy came by night and planted tares to ruin his field. As the plants grew, the farmer could tell that his field had been messed with.
The servents who took care of the field wanted to pull out the weeds, but the farmer was afraid that if he had all the tares pulled out, good crop would likewise be destroyed. He concluded that it was best to allow them both to grow together until the harvest. During harvest, the separation could begin.
This parable was designed by Jesus to tell us that in community discipline, purging and purifying the group can go too far. As we get rid of the bad, good people will likewise be yanked out of the community. This happens in two ways. First of all, when church boards / community leaders get on the roll of throwing out the bad, they begin to fall into the mistake of seeing bad in the good. In other words, they go too far and before too long they are tossing out good people. The Salem Witchhunt was an extreme example of this. The second way that church discipline hurts a church is when the community leaders discipline (someone who does deserve it) there will probably be good people who are affected and will leave on their own.
Discipline in a church carries good and bad consequences. This not to say that we should not have discipline because there will be bad consequences; it is to say that we need to knowthe consequences, consider the consequences, and act wisely when we do discipline.
Monday, January 23, 2012
Two Types of Judging
DIFFERENT JUDGMENTS
In the book of 1 Corinthians, Paul rebuked his church for not judging one in the congregation who was steeped in open fornication. He also told people to stop going to secular law for matters of judgment; rather than going outside the church, he told them to set up the least esteemed among them to judge between two Christian people suing each other. Paul pleaded, "Don't you know that we will judge angels?" He was trying to convince them to judge within their own community and not to take judgments outside of the community.
On the surface this looks like a contradiction...judge not, so you will not be judged (Matthew 7:1), but judge among yourselves (1 Corinthians). Paul wanted to have the church judge them that were within the community and leave outside judgment to God (1 Corinthians 5:9-13). But Paul also told the same church not to judge before the time when Christ will return and be able to expose hidden thoughts and intentions (1Corinthians 4:1-5).
When we have such an obvious contradiction, we need to look to the context to see what is going on. And in the context, we can see that the Bible's "to judge" had different meanings, much like today. A judge who judges me is different than when I critically judge others and look down on them. Likewise a church that needs to discipline (needs to judge) a church leader who is steeped in open sin is different than being critical or judgmental about the way other people do things.
Communities need the one judgment and are hurt by the other. I will address both in the blogs that follow.
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
How to Forgive
If forgiveness is imperative, then how do we forgive?
THE UPSIDE TO UNFORGIVING
Believe it or not, there is an upside to anger, bitterness and so on. But having said this, I definately need to explain.
The reason you (or any human being) are having problems forgiving is because somebody has done you wrong. The anger or bitterness that you have is a defense mechanism, protecting you from further attack. Pay attention to this and treasure this part of it. Those feelings are telling you to get away from a certain person or group.
The problem however, is this. Our defense mechanism is wacky. Because of self centeredness, we hold negative feelings toward people or entities that don't deserve it or that haven't lived up to our own personal (and unreasonable) expectations. We also like to hold on to negative feelings for much longer than we need to. In fact, some of us hold on to those feelings and never get over them.
BASIC RULES AND DEFINITIONS
1. Forgiveness means to let go. When you forgive someone you let go of whatever he/she owes you.
2. The need to forgive may not be known to you, even if you are very intellegent. You may be holding a deep grudge that is hidden deeply inside of you.
3. A lack of forgiveness is usually, but not always, directed toward those who are closest to us. That means parents, spouse, brothers or sisters, co-workers, and so on.
4. Forgiveness can also be needed for entities such as the church that hurt you, the company that fired you, the country or political party that betrayed you or that does such evil, and so on. This could be very hard for someone who is wrapped up in ongoing political feelings and emotions that are focused on some political enemy.
5. Forgiveness may be needed toward God. What did God do or not do to you? For a Christian, this may be the most difficult anger or grudge to admit, to face up to.
6. The time it takes to forgive is directly related to how deep the hurt is. If you have been hurt in a small way, then you need very little time to forgive; but if you have been deeply wounded, you may need months if not more to forgive.
7. Forgiveness does not mean you should allow yourself to stay in a bad relationship.
8. Forgiveness does not mean that you should nurse a dependent relationship, where an alcoholic or drug user depends upon you for their bad behavior.
9. Forgiveness does not mean that you should stay in an abusive relationship.
10. The lack of forgiveness is a natural reaction to injustice. Usually, this type of injustice is best defined as "a wrong done to me."
EXCUSES TO KEEP, HIDE OR NURTURE GRUDGES
People typically use excuses to hold on to and to feed grudges. Here are some of them.
1. "So and so does not deserve my forgiveness." This is a cry for justice, the need to make things right.
2. "I never hold a grudges." This is pride covering up for your emotions that do not live up to your standards. EX: I am a good person. It is wrong for a good person not to forgive. I therefore, forgive. The problem with this is - there is still unforgiveness going on inside being covered up or denied because of your conviction that it is wrong. Your emotions are being pushed aside and ignored in order to serve the desire to be a good person. In reality it is pride.
3. "It's not fair." Human beings are hard-wired to demand fairness / justice - especially as it relates to one's self or one's own group. Our sense of justice can hide, justify and even nurture a grudge.
4. "It is not evil, it is my duty to be angry." Radio show political pundits thrive on this type of hatred and anger. Some of you are lost and bound up in this. You justify it as righteous indignation, but it is bitterness and it is eating away at your soul.
5. "I'm not angry, I'm just frustrated." This is also pride covering up for emotions that do not live up to your standards. If you are only frustrated, you don't have to look deeper and discover the truth that you are nursing a grudge. It is the story you give yourself to feel better about yourself.
6. "I would never be angry at my parents (my church, my friends, etc.)... they were so good." This is one set of emotions hiding another set of emotions. It can also be reason or pride covering emotions. You can be denying or ignoring negative feelings on the basis of your need to feel like you are a good/godly/righteous/ etc. person. You may realized that God would never do any evil to you, but your emotions are crying out that He has betrayed you. You may have reasoned correctly, but your emotions are not following your reasoning.
7. "There is no reason for me to be angry." This is the classic case of reason covering up or overriding your emotions.
8. "I always forgive people. I don't have a grudge. I never get angry." Again, these are declarations of pride, oftentimes covering real anger, real grudges and real hurt.
REASONS WHY FORGIVENESS IS NECESSARY
My last blog pointed out biblical reasons to forgive... so you can be forgiven. There are other reasons as well:
1. Unforgiveness consumes. With a grudge, you are destroying yourself to get even with somebody else. It doesn't make sense, but that is how it works.
2. Unforgiveness destroys communities.
3. Bitterness corrupts the entire person and a million small actions that person does for and toward others. You may be bitter toward one person, but it is going to affect your mood and your action towards a lot of other people, especially if others remind you (consciously or unconsciously) of the person you do not forgive.
4. Bitterness negatively affects your personality.
STEP ONE IN FORGIVENESS
The first step in forgiving is admitting you need to forgive. It means breaking through all the excuses you have been holding on to and admitting, "I am bitter at ...."
This admission is difficult at first because you have to break through the pride of thinking that you are above bitterness.
This admission is difficult because it means breaking away from your sense of justice. Forgiveness feels like you are letting someone off the hook who does not deserve it.
This admission is difficult because your own emotions will fight it.
The admission is most difficult for many of you because it is so hard to admit that that you could be angry with God. "God never does anything wrong," you say. But in your heart, you are angry at Him because He could have done something to help you in a time of need. You say to yourself, "God did nothing wrong," and you are right. But our emotions do not follow ultimate truth. Our emotions follow self interest.
This admission is difficult because it will tear down the reasons you have built up for... days? months? years?
This admisssion is difficult, but once you have begun to admit that you need to forgive, you will find freedom you have not known since it began (perhaps years ago). So take a good look and say to yourself and to God, "I have a grudge, I am angry, I have not forgiven." Admit it and find the first liberating step to freedom, peace, and forgiveness.
ALL THE STEPS TO FREEDOM
These are steps that have helped me through the years. They are one way that works. But remember, the more you hurt, the longer it will take to forgive, and the longer it will take to move effectively through this process. Deep betrayals do not go away overnight.
1. Step One - Admit you have not forgiven. This step breaks through the pride, the excuses, the reasons, the protectors that surround unforgiveness. Part of this admission may be venting in private, before God, letting Him know how you feel.
2. Step Two - Admit you need to forgive. For someone who has been deeply hurt, this is most difficult. Tell God you know you need to forgive. Tell Him that you don't want to forgive (you won't shock God, He already knows it - its you who may have had no clue that you didn't want to forgive - I speak from my own personal experience).
3. Step Three - Say the words, "I forgive." You probably won't feel it at first, in fact, the words may be incredibly diffictult to say; but say the words anyway. You may qualify this by telling God, you don't feel it, but you will say it anyway. Keep this up until the day comes when you will say, "I forgive," and you will know you really are forgiving.
WARNING!
When you finally forgive:
Do not jump back into a bad relationship.
Do not put yourself in a vulnerable situation whereby you will once again be easily targeted for disaster.
Do not automaticly trust the person who hurt you - trust needs to be earned, and no matter how much you may want someone to be honorable, most people do not change their habits, as the proverb says, "a leper cannot change its spots."
Forgive, but in so doing, protect yourself.
THE UPSIDE TO UNFORGIVING
Believe it or not, there is an upside to anger, bitterness and so on. But having said this, I definately need to explain.
The reason you (or any human being) are having problems forgiving is because somebody has done you wrong. The anger or bitterness that you have is a defense mechanism, protecting you from further attack. Pay attention to this and treasure this part of it. Those feelings are telling you to get away from a certain person or group.
The problem however, is this. Our defense mechanism is wacky. Because of self centeredness, we hold negative feelings toward people or entities that don't deserve it or that haven't lived up to our own personal (and unreasonable) expectations. We also like to hold on to negative feelings for much longer than we need to. In fact, some of us hold on to those feelings and never get over them.
BASIC RULES AND DEFINITIONS
1. Forgiveness means to let go. When you forgive someone you let go of whatever he/she owes you.
2. The need to forgive may not be known to you, even if you are very intellegent. You may be holding a deep grudge that is hidden deeply inside of you.
3. A lack of forgiveness is usually, but not always, directed toward those who are closest to us. That means parents, spouse, brothers or sisters, co-workers, and so on.
4. Forgiveness can also be needed for entities such as the church that hurt you, the company that fired you, the country or political party that betrayed you or that does such evil, and so on. This could be very hard for someone who is wrapped up in ongoing political feelings and emotions that are focused on some political enemy.
5. Forgiveness may be needed toward God. What did God do or not do to you? For a Christian, this may be the most difficult anger or grudge to admit, to face up to.
6. The time it takes to forgive is directly related to how deep the hurt is. If you have been hurt in a small way, then you need very little time to forgive; but if you have been deeply wounded, you may need months if not more to forgive.
7. Forgiveness does not mean you should allow yourself to stay in a bad relationship.
8. Forgiveness does not mean that you should nurse a dependent relationship, where an alcoholic or drug user depends upon you for their bad behavior.
9. Forgiveness does not mean that you should stay in an abusive relationship.
10. The lack of forgiveness is a natural reaction to injustice. Usually, this type of injustice is best defined as "a wrong done to me."
EXCUSES TO KEEP, HIDE OR NURTURE GRUDGES
People typically use excuses to hold on to and to feed grudges. Here are some of them.
1. "So and so does not deserve my forgiveness." This is a cry for justice, the need to make things right.
2. "I never hold a grudges." This is pride covering up for your emotions that do not live up to your standards. EX: I am a good person. It is wrong for a good person not to forgive. I therefore, forgive. The problem with this is - there is still unforgiveness going on inside being covered up or denied because of your conviction that it is wrong. Your emotions are being pushed aside and ignored in order to serve the desire to be a good person. In reality it is pride.
3. "It's not fair." Human beings are hard-wired to demand fairness / justice - especially as it relates to one's self or one's own group. Our sense of justice can hide, justify and even nurture a grudge.
4. "It is not evil, it is my duty to be angry." Radio show political pundits thrive on this type of hatred and anger. Some of you are lost and bound up in this. You justify it as righteous indignation, but it is bitterness and it is eating away at your soul.
5. "I'm not angry, I'm just frustrated." This is also pride covering up for emotions that do not live up to your standards. If you are only frustrated, you don't have to look deeper and discover the truth that you are nursing a grudge. It is the story you give yourself to feel better about yourself.
6. "I would never be angry at my parents (my church, my friends, etc.)... they were so good." This is one set of emotions hiding another set of emotions. It can also be reason or pride covering emotions. You can be denying or ignoring negative feelings on the basis of your need to feel like you are a good/godly/righteous/ etc. person. You may realized that God would never do any evil to you, but your emotions are crying out that He has betrayed you. You may have reasoned correctly, but your emotions are not following your reasoning.
7. "There is no reason for me to be angry." This is the classic case of reason covering up or overriding your emotions.
8. "I always forgive people. I don't have a grudge. I never get angry." Again, these are declarations of pride, oftentimes covering real anger, real grudges and real hurt.
REASONS WHY FORGIVENESS IS NECESSARY
My last blog pointed out biblical reasons to forgive... so you can be forgiven. There are other reasons as well:
1. Unforgiveness consumes. With a grudge, you are destroying yourself to get even with somebody else. It doesn't make sense, but that is how it works.
2. Unforgiveness destroys communities.
3. Bitterness corrupts the entire person and a million small actions that person does for and toward others. You may be bitter toward one person, but it is going to affect your mood and your action towards a lot of other people, especially if others remind you (consciously or unconsciously) of the person you do not forgive.
4. Bitterness negatively affects your personality.
STEP ONE IN FORGIVENESS
The first step in forgiving is admitting you need to forgive. It means breaking through all the excuses you have been holding on to and admitting, "I am bitter at ...."
This admission is difficult at first because you have to break through the pride of thinking that you are above bitterness.
This admission is difficult because it means breaking away from your sense of justice. Forgiveness feels like you are letting someone off the hook who does not deserve it.
This admission is difficult because your own emotions will fight it.
The admission is most difficult for many of you because it is so hard to admit that that you could be angry with God. "God never does anything wrong," you say. But in your heart, you are angry at Him because He could have done something to help you in a time of need. You say to yourself, "God did nothing wrong," and you are right. But our emotions do not follow ultimate truth. Our emotions follow self interest.
This admission is difficult because it will tear down the reasons you have built up for... days? months? years?
This admisssion is difficult, but once you have begun to admit that you need to forgive, you will find freedom you have not known since it began (perhaps years ago). So take a good look and say to yourself and to God, "I have a grudge, I am angry, I have not forgiven." Admit it and find the first liberating step to freedom, peace, and forgiveness.
ALL THE STEPS TO FREEDOM
These are steps that have helped me through the years. They are one way that works. But remember, the more you hurt, the longer it will take to forgive, and the longer it will take to move effectively through this process. Deep betrayals do not go away overnight.
1. Step One - Admit you have not forgiven. This step breaks through the pride, the excuses, the reasons, the protectors that surround unforgiveness. Part of this admission may be venting in private, before God, letting Him know how you feel.
2. Step Two - Admit you need to forgive. For someone who has been deeply hurt, this is most difficult. Tell God you know you need to forgive. Tell Him that you don't want to forgive (you won't shock God, He already knows it - its you who may have had no clue that you didn't want to forgive - I speak from my own personal experience).
3. Step Three - Say the words, "I forgive." You probably won't feel it at first, in fact, the words may be incredibly diffictult to say; but say the words anyway. You may qualify this by telling God, you don't feel it, but you will say it anyway. Keep this up until the day comes when you will say, "I forgive," and you will know you really are forgiving.
WARNING!
When you finally forgive:
Do not jump back into a bad relationship.
Do not put yourself in a vulnerable situation whereby you will once again be easily targeted for disaster.
Do not automaticly trust the person who hurt you - trust needs to be earned, and no matter how much you may want someone to be honorable, most people do not change their habits, as the proverb says, "a leper cannot change its spots."
Forgive, but in so doing, protect yourself.
Monday, January 9, 2012
How to Be a Peacemaker - Forgiveness
The first lesson in becoming a peacemaker is learning how to forgive. Forgiveness was so important to Jesus that he placed it within the Lord's prayer and then commented on forgiveness immediately after the Lord's Prayer.
A SUMMARY OF THE LORD'S PRAYER AND ITS COMMENTARY
In order to be forgiven, you must forgive. If you do not forgive, you will not be forgiven.
A SUMMARY OF JESUS' PARABLE IN MATTHEW 18:21-25
In order to be forgiven, you must forgive. If you do not forgive, you will not be forgiven.
CONCLUSIONS
No ifs, ands, or buts about it, forgiveness is imperative.
A SUMMARY OF THE LORD'S PRAYER AND ITS COMMENTARY
In order to be forgiven, you must forgive. If you do not forgive, you will not be forgiven.
A SUMMARY OF JESUS' PARABLE IN MATTHEW 18:21-25
In order to be forgiven, you must forgive. If you do not forgive, you will not be forgiven.
CONCLUSIONS
No ifs, ands, or buts about it, forgiveness is imperative.
Saturday, January 7, 2012
Rules for Community - Get Along
Beginning with the beatitudes the Sermon on the Mount emphasized the importance of getting along. One beatitude says, "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God (Matthew 5:9)."
From Jesus' teachings, I would say that keeping and making peace in the context of one's community was what Jesus wanted to see in his followers. The following blogs are some of the different ways that Jesus taught his followers to keep and make peace with each other.
From Jesus' teachings, I would say that keeping and making peace in the context of one's community was what Jesus wanted to see in his followers. The following blogs are some of the different ways that Jesus taught his followers to keep and make peace with each other.
Friday, January 6, 2012
Rules for Community - Share with Others
In the book of Luke, Jesus clearly taught us that the way into the kingdom of God was the way of giving.
1. John the Baptist told people to show the works of repentance before they were baptized. When they asked what they should do, John told them to share what they had with others who were in need.
2. In the Sermon on the Plain (Luke 6), Jesus told his listeners that the kingdom of God was given to the poor and therefore, they were blessed.
3. In the same sermon, he told the rich that they had all they were going to get. In other words, the kingdom of God was not for them... unless they could use their money to "buy friends with the mammon of unrighteousness (Luke 16:9)."
4. Zacchaeus (Luke 19), who was a rich man, found salvation by obeying Jesus' teachings in giving over half of what he had to the poor.
The early Christians followed Jesus' teachings by sharing everything they had with each other. The book of Acts (which was written by Luke) recorded their experience:
All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need (Luke 2:44-45).
So, rule number one in following Jesus and joining him in his community - share with those who have less than you.
Thursday, January 5, 2012
The Beginnings of Community - Social Dynamics of Repentance
Repentance often meant breaking away from one community and joining another.
BREAKING FROM ONE COMMUNITY
1. If all one's friends were into robbery, then repentance would have meant, in the very least, a breaking away from what that group was doing... and when there is a breakaway from the main focus of a group, there is inevitably a break away from the group itself.
2. On the other hand, if all that person's friends were very religious, keeping the Laws of the Bible, then repentance would have meant the beginning of walking to the beat of a different drum. Jesus supported the Law, but had a different emphasis on what was important in the Law. Jesus placed emphasis on laws that served others. So when a religeous person repented and was baptized into following Jesus, it meant turning one's back on the traditional focus on holiness and purity, and stressed more serving others in order to serve God.
Nicodemus, who was a Pharisee (a strong religious ruler in Israel) made feeble attempts to follow Jesus quietly, and saw that there were definite consequences for even the smallest attempts to say good things about Jesus.
Groups like conformity. Any attempt to be different from a group faces ramifications. Becoming a follower of Jesus broke conformity within groups that were not centered on Jesus, and therefore set people apart from the different groups of the first century, as it still does today.
BREAKING INTO A NEW COMMUNITY BEFORE THE RESURRECTION
According to the Gospels, sometimes, Jesus discouraged large tight-knit groups from building up around his ministry and his person. When a group of listeners attempted to group permanently together (for the sake of miraculous daily food or for the wrong kind of leadership), Jesus rejected the followers and sabotaged the their attempt. And when a city wanted to make him their king, he left by stealth.
Jesus knew that people grouped around him for the wrong reasons and he knew that until he had been taken to the cross, people would read into him their own personal and national hopes and dreams. Even his closest followers expected Jesus to lead them into their own hopes and visions, which expectations Jesus called demonic (Mark 8:33). Jesus knew that until he faced the cross, and until he rose from the dead, they would only look to him for personal and social interests.
For the greater part of Jesus' ministry, his closest disciples remained perplexed over many of his teachings that did not fit within their own preconceived notions concerning the purpose and the goals of the messiah.
BREAKING INTO A NEW COMMUNITY AFTER THE RESURRECTION
Despite being set aside as an odd grouping of people that shared everything, early Christians experienced a short term of popularity with those who were outside of the group. This was highly unusual for a group llike this to be popular. But then again, their popularity did not last long.
BREAKING FROM ONE COMMUNITY
1. If all one's friends were into robbery, then repentance would have meant, in the very least, a breaking away from what that group was doing... and when there is a breakaway from the main focus of a group, there is inevitably a break away from the group itself.
2. On the other hand, if all that person's friends were very religious, keeping the Laws of the Bible, then repentance would have meant the beginning of walking to the beat of a different drum. Jesus supported the Law, but had a different emphasis on what was important in the Law. Jesus placed emphasis on laws that served others. So when a religeous person repented and was baptized into following Jesus, it meant turning one's back on the traditional focus on holiness and purity, and stressed more serving others in order to serve God.
Nicodemus, who was a Pharisee (a strong religious ruler in Israel) made feeble attempts to follow Jesus quietly, and saw that there were definite consequences for even the smallest attempts to say good things about Jesus.
Groups like conformity. Any attempt to be different from a group faces ramifications. Becoming a follower of Jesus broke conformity within groups that were not centered on Jesus, and therefore set people apart from the different groups of the first century, as it still does today.
BREAKING INTO A NEW COMMUNITY BEFORE THE RESURRECTION
According to the Gospels, sometimes, Jesus discouraged large tight-knit groups from building up around his ministry and his person. When a group of listeners attempted to group permanently together (for the sake of miraculous daily food or for the wrong kind of leadership), Jesus rejected the followers and sabotaged the their attempt. And when a city wanted to make him their king, he left by stealth.
Jesus knew that people grouped around him for the wrong reasons and he knew that until he had been taken to the cross, people would read into him their own personal and national hopes and dreams. Even his closest followers expected Jesus to lead them into their own hopes and visions, which expectations Jesus called demonic (Mark 8:33). Jesus knew that until he faced the cross, and until he rose from the dead, they would only look to him for personal and social interests.
After Jesus died and after the resurrection, Jesus' followers bonded together around a messiah / prophet who brought in the kingdom of God by signs and wonders, who taught them how to live in that kingdom's community, and who showed them that the kingdom of God came with suffering and death as well as with glory.
For the greater part of Jesus' ministry, his closest disciples remained perplexed over many of his teachings that did not fit within their own preconceived notions concerning the purpose and the goals of the messiah.
BREAKING INTO A NEW COMMUNITY AFTER THE RESURRECTION
When people repented and were baptized into the group of his followers after his death and resurrection, they shared everything they had with the rest of the group (Acts), just as Jesus taught his disciples (Luke). More than anything, sharing everything set the Christians apart from all other groups. It built an identity apart from every other group, because such radical giving made insiders (those who shared) and it created outsiders (those who watched what was going on).
There were also other ways the new group of followers distinguished themselves from the other groups in Israel. They believed:
-Jesus rose from the dead.
-Jesus was the messiah.
-Religious rulers were corrupt and filled with hypocracy.
-People from other groups needed to repent and follow Jesus.
There were also other ways the new group of followers distinguished themselves from the other groups in Israel. They believed:
-Jesus rose from the dead.
-Jesus was the messiah.
-Religious rulers were corrupt and filled with hypocracy.
-People from other groups needed to repent and follow Jesus.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)